Skip to content
[ aicodereview.io ]

Aikido Security

Security · #3 of 3 in category · #18 of 27 overall

All-in-one AppSec platform (SAST, SCA, secrets, cloud) with AI autotriage and autofix PRs, built on tuned open-source scanners.

[ Where it fits ]

On the documented evidence, Aikido Security suits larger orgs willing to buy an enterprise plan for self-hosting.

[ Documented strengths ]

No standard is fully documented as met in public sources.

[ Documented gaps ]

  • Business Logic Validation. Jira/Linear sync creates tickets from findings; no validation of code against requirements.
  • Sandbox Validation. Static and reachability analysis; no sandbox execution of code or fixes.
  • Economic Transparency. Vendor-managed LLM (Claude on Bedrock) with credit-metered AI features; no model choice.

[ Facts ]

Category
Security
Open source
No — proprietary
Pricing
Free Developer plan (2 users); Basic $300/mo and Pro/Advanced from $600/mo (10 users incl., scales by users); Enterprise custom; 10% off annual billing source ↗
Self-hosted
Enterprise only — SaaS-first; Pro adds on-premises/local scanning and Enterprise offers on-premises deployment options.
Model control
Fixed vendor models (Claude via AWS Bedrock) for AutoFix and AutoTriage; no BYOK
Last verified
2026-08-11

[ Against the 9 standards ]

Based on public documentation as of 2026-08-11. ✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. Undocumented scores zero — see the methodology.

~ Multi-dimensional Context

Reachability engine plus code and cloud context feed AI autotriage; no multi-repo or requirements context.

~ Rule-Centric & Default Quiet

Curated scanner rules with rule-based plus LLM autotriage; noise reduction is the core pitch.

~ Dual-Workflow: Local vs. PR

IDE plugins, CI gating, and PR security reviews; no documented distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes.

Business Logic Validation

Jira/Linear sync creates tickets from findings; no validation of code against requirements.

? Continuous Learning

No documented learning from team feedback beyond standard ignore/triage states.

Sandbox Validation

Static and reachability analysis; no sandbox execution of code or fixes.

Economic Transparency

Vendor-managed LLM (Claude on Bedrock) with credit-metered AI features; no model choice.

~ Actionability

AI AutoFix opens fix PRs for 91 SAST rules (JS/TS, Python, Java, .NET, PHP) plus SCA/IaC fixes.

~ Measurable ROI

Security posture and compliance reporting; no dev-cycle or review-ROI metrics.

[ Closest alternatives ]

[ FAQ ]

Is Aikido Security open source?

No. Aikido Security is proprietary — you can use it, but you cannot read or fork the review engine.

Can Aikido Security be self-hosted?

Enterprise only. SaaS-first; Pro adds on-premises/local scanning and Enterprise offers on-premises deployment options. Verified against the vendor's own documentation on 2026-08-11.

How much does Aikido Security cost?

Free Developer plan (2 users); Basic $300/mo and Pro/Advanced from $600/mo (10 users incl., scales by users); Enterprise custom; 10% off annual billing. Seat price is only part of the bill: Aikido Security handles models as fixed vendor models (claude via aws bedrock) for autofix and autotriage; no byok, which is what usually decides the real monthly cost.

How does Aikido Security score against the 9-pillar AI code review standard?

2.5 out of 9. It fully documents 0 standards, partially documents 5, does not offer 3, and leaves 1 undocumented. The score is coverage of documented capability, not a measure of review quality.

What are the alternatives to Aikido Security?

The closest tools in this directory are Snyk Code, Semgrep, Bito, Cursor BugBot. Each is scored against the same 9 standards, so the matrices are directly comparable.

Evaluating Aikido Security?

Run it through the two-week trial protocol before you commit a team to it.

Evaluation guide [↗]