Cubic
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI code review for GitHub PRs plus scheduled whole-codebase bug scans, with local CLI review, custom agents, and issue checks.
7.5/9 Coverage score 7.5 out of 9
Unknown $30/dev/mo
The AI Code Review Directory · Updated 2026-08-11
Every AI code review tool, measured against one public standard.
No star ratings and no affiliate rankings. 27 tools mapped against 9 engineering standards — pricing, licence, self-hosting, model control — each with the source it came from and the date we checked it.
- 27
- Tools tracked
- 9
- Standards scored
- 8
- Self-hostable
- 4
- Open source
Editor's picks
One pick per dimension, each the highest-scoring tool that qualifies. The ranked list below is pure arithmetic — this strip is where we choose which dimension leads.
Best for reviewing against your own standards Kodus 6.5/9 The only tool here documenting all four at once: reads the wider codebase rather than the diff, enforces rules your team writes, checks the change against what the ticket asked for, and keeps model spend visible instead of bundled. Covers 5 platforms, more than anything else in the directory. Best documented coverage Cubic 7.5/9 Covers more of the 9-pillar baseline than anything else in the directory, at 7.5/9. Best for validated findings Augment Code 6.5/9 Cosmos Verifier agent exercises changes in a running environment and reports evidence-backed findings. Best for reviewing against the ticket CodeAnt AI 6.5/9 Jira Ticket Compliance cross-verifies ticket requirements against the PR (compliant/partial/non-compliant).
The directory
Ranked by documented coverage of the 9 standards. Filter it, then open any tool for the sourced matrix behind its score.
Showing all 27 tools
Augment Code
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Code review agent in the Cosmos platform: risk-triaged inline PR comments with full-codebase context; GitHub-native, others via CLI.
6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9
AD Cloud only $100/mo flat
Baz
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Review platform running specialized agents (code, spec, security, merge) on GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps PRs with sandbox execution.
6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $30/dev/mo
Kodus
AI PR Review · AGPL-3.0
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9
AD Self-hostable $10/dev/mo Open source
CodeAnt AI
AI PR Review · Proprietary
PR reviewer with severity-ranked comments and one-click fixes across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus SAST scanning.
6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $24/user/mo
Entelligence AI
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Reviews PRs on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket with codebase and team context, plus CLI pre-PR review and engineering metrics.
6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9
Self-hostable See pricing
CodeRabbit
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Hosted AI PR reviewer with summaries, linter/SAST integration, and agentic chat across GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket.
6/9 Coverage score 6 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $24/dev/mo
Semgrep
Security · LGPL-2.1
Open-source static analysis engine with a commercial AppSec Platform adding cross-file analysis and an AI assistant for triage.
4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9
AD Self-hostable $30/contributor/mo Open source
Greptile
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI code reviewer that indexes the whole codebase into a graph; its TREX agent writes and runs tests for PRs in a sandbox.
4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9
Enterprise only $30/seat/mo
Tabnine
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Enterprise AI dev platform whose Code Review Agent checks PRs against plain-language team rules on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9
Self-hostable $39/user/mo
SonarQube
Code Quality · LGPL-3.0
Deterministic static analysis platform (Server and Cloud) with PR decoration and LLM-generated AI CodeFix suggestions.
4/9 Coverage score 4 out of 9
AD Self-hostable $34/mo Open source
Codacy
Code Quality · Proprietary
Code-quality platform covering 49 languages and 12,000+ static rules, SAST, secrets, SCA, and IaC, with an AI review layer on top.
4/9 Coverage score 4 out of 9
Cloud only $18/dev/mo
Qodana
Static Analysis · Proprietary
JetBrains' static analysis for CI, running IDE inspections in pipelines with quality gates, baselines, and cloud reports.
3.5/9 Coverage score 3.5 out of 9
AD Self-hostable $5/contributor/mo
Qodo
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI platform spanning IDE assistant, CLI, and Qodo Merge PR review with test generation; enterprise on-prem and air-gapped options.
3.5/9 Coverage score 3.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $30/mo base
Gemini Code Assist
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Google's coding assistant whose GitHub app auto-reviews pull requests with severity-ranked comments and committable fixes.
3/9 Coverage score 3 out of 9
Cloud only $19/user/mo
OpenReview
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Vercel Labs' self-hosted GitHub review bot: mention @openreview for Claude-powered inline suggestions; dormant beta since March 2026.
3/9 Coverage score 3 out of 9
Self-hostable Free (self-run)
Snyk Code
Security · Proprietary
Developer-focused SAST built on Snyk's DeepCode AI engine, with PR checks and AI fix suggestions across major git platforms.
3/9 Coverage score 3 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $25/contributor/mo
Aikido Security
Security · Proprietary
All-in-one AppSec platform (SAST, SCA, secrets, cloud) with AI autotriage and autofix PRs, built on tuned open-source scanners.
2.5/9 Coverage score 2.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $300/mo
Cursor BugBot
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Cursor's PR reviewer scoped to bugs, security issues, and rule violations, billed per run (avg $1.00-1.50) since June 2026.
2.5/9 Coverage score 2.5 out of 9
AD Cloud only From $20/mo (Cursor)
PR-Agent
AI PR Review · MIT
Community-maintained, MIT-licensed PR reviewer with /review, /describe, and /improve commands, self-hosted with your own model keys.
2.5/9 Coverage score 2.5 out of 9
AD Self-hostable Free (MIT) Open source
Bito
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI Code Review Agent for GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket with repo-aware reviews, custom guidelines, Jira integration, and analytics.
2.5/9 Coverage score 2.5 out of 9
Unknown $12/seat/mo
GitHub Copilot code review
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Pull request review bundled into paid GitHub Copilot plans; reviews the diff with instructions-file customization, metered by AI credits.
2/9 Coverage score 2 out of 9
Cloud only $10/mo
Sourcery
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI reviewer for GitHub and GitLab with line-by-line reviews, summaries and diagrams, custom rules, and BYO-LLM on its Team tier.
1.5/9 Coverage score 1.5 out of 9
Enterprise only $12/seat/mo
DeepSource
Code Quality · Proprietary
Static-analysis platform (quality, coverage, secrets) with Autofix and a metered AI Review add-on; free for open-source repos.
1.5/9 Coverage score 1.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only $24/user/mo
Panto
AI PR Review · Proprietary
AI code reviewer with 30,000+ security checks, IaC and secrets scanning, and business context pulled from Jira and Confluence.
1.5/9 Coverage score 1.5 out of 9
AD Enterprise only See pricing
What The Diff
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Writes PR descriptions from the diff, sends changelog notifications to stakeholders, and does small /wtd refactors on GitHub and GitLab.
1/9 Coverage score 1 out of 9
Cloud only $19/mo
Graphite
AI PR Review · Proprietary
Code review platform built around stacked PRs, with an AI reviewer (formerly Diamond), merge queue, and review automation for GitHub.
1/9 Coverage score 1 out of 9
Cloud only $20/user/mo
Nothing matches those filters.
Top 12 at a glance
The same data as the cards above, in one scannable table. Coverage is capability documented by the vendor, not review quality — read the methodology before treating it as a verdict.
| # | Tool | Coverage | Self-hosting | Licence | Free tier | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cubic AI PR Review | 7.5/9 Coverage score 7.5 out of 9 | Unknown | Proprietary | Limited free tier | $30/dev/mo |
| =2 | Augment Code AI PR Review | 6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9 | Cloud only | Proprietary | Unknown | $100/mo flat |
| =2 | Baz AI PR Review | 6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9 | Enterprise only | Proprietary | Unknown | $30/dev/mo |
| =2 | Kodus AI PR Review | 6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Open source | Limited free tier | $10/dev/mo |
| =2 | CodeAnt AI AI PR Review | 6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9 | Enterprise only | Proprietary | Trial only | $24/user/mo |
| =2 | Entelligence AI AI PR Review | 6.5/9 Coverage score 6.5 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Proprietary | Unknown | See pricing |
| 7 | CodeRabbit AI PR Review | 6/9 Coverage score 6 out of 9 | Enterprise only | Proprietary | Limited free tier | $24/dev/mo |
| =8 | Semgrep Security | 4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Open source | Limited free tier | $30/contributor/mo |
| =8 | Greptile AI PR Review | 4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9 | Enterprise only | Proprietary | Limited free tier | $30/seat/mo |
| =8 | Tabnine AI PR Review | 4.5/9 Coverage score 4.5 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Proprietary | No free tier | $39/user/mo |
| =11 | SonarQube Code Quality | 4/9 Coverage score 4 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Open source | Limited free tier | $34/mo |
| =11 | Codacy Code Quality | 4/9 Coverage score 4 out of 9 | Cloud only | Proprietary | Limited free tier | $18/dev/mo |
Head to head
All comparisons → Comparison Augment Code vs CodeRabbit 6.5/9 · 6/9
Comparison Augment Code vs Kodus 6.5/9 · 6.5/9
Comparison Baz vs CodeRabbit 6.5/9 · 6/9
Comparison Baz vs Kodus 6.5/9 · 6.5/9
Comparison Bito vs CodeRabbit 2.5/9 · 6/9
Comparison Bito vs Kodus 2.5/9 · 6.5/9
Comparison CodeAnt AI vs CodeRabbit 6.5/9 · 6/9
Comparison CodeAnt AI vs Kodus 6.5/9 · 6.5/9
Browse by category
AI PR Review
20 toolsTools whose main job is reviewing a pull request and leaving findings on the diff.
Cubic · Augment Code · Baz · Kodus
Security
3 toolsScanners built around vulnerability classes, dependencies, and secrets rather than general review.
Semgrep · Snyk Code · Aikido Security
Code Quality
3 toolsPlatforms that track maintainability, duplication, and coverage across a whole codebase over time.
SonarQube · Codacy · DeepSource
Static Analysis
1 toolsRule- and pattern-based analyzers that run without an LLM in the loop.
Qodana
Self-hosted
8 toolsReviewers that run inside your own network, for teams whose code cannot leave it.
By platform
6 platformsWhich tools actually support GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and self-hosted forges — the shortest path to ruling candidates out.
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps
Open source
4 toolsTools whose source you can read, audit and fork before you trust them with your codebase.
From the blog
All posts → Comparisons
Free AI Code Review Tools: What "Free" Actually Costs You
A hands-on look at what "free" really means across AI code review tools — metered credits, trials, BYO-LLM, and how to evaluate them.
Guides
AI code review that follows YOUR coding rules: how to evaluate custom-standards support
Most AI reviewers catch generic bugs. Whether one will follow your team's own coding rules is a separate question. Here's how to evaluate custom-standards support before you buy.
Comparisons
Pullfrog vs CodeRabbit: don't compare the wrong thing
Pullfrog is a BYOK harness over Claude Code and Codex, not a first-party reviewer like CodeRabbit. Review quality is model-attributed, not harness-attributed. Here's what actually separates them.
Comparisons
Pullfrog vs CodeRabbit: what a BYOK bot actually changes for AI code review
An eval-grounded look at Pullfrog vs CodeRabbit: when a reviewer wraps Claude Code or Codex, review quality is model-attributed, not harness-attributed. The real difference is the credential boundary.
9 pillars
9 standards every AI code reviewer should meet, and why each one exists. This is what the scores are measured against.
Learn10 guides
Long-form guides on running code review well — process, metrics, security, scale — independent of which tool you buy.
Reference57 terms
Plain definitions for the vocabulary vendors use — from cyclomatic complexity to BYOK — with what it means when you are buying.
Common questions
What is the best AI code review tool in 2026?
There is no single best one — it depends on which of the 9 standards your team actually needs. This directory ranks 27 tools by how much of that baseline each vendor's own documentation backs up, and shows the full matrix so you can re-rank on the pillars that matter to you. As of 2026-08-11, Cubic leads on documented coverage at 7.5/9.
How is the coverage score calculated?
Each tool is mapped against 9 standards with four values: documented (1 point), partial (0.5), not offered (0) and undocumented (0). The sum is the score out of 9. Undocumented counts as zero on purpose — a capability nobody can find in the docs is one a buyer cannot rely on. The full formula and the sources are public.
Which AI code review tools can be self-hosted?
8 of the 27 tools in this directory document full self-hosting on their standard plans; several more offer it only on an enterprise contract. If code cannot leave your network, filter the directory by self-hosting before you compare anything else.
Are there open-source AI code review tools?
Yes — 4 of the 27 tools here publish their source. Open source and self-hostable are not the same thing, and the licence matters: some are permissive, some copyleft, some dual-licensed with commercial-only files.
How often is this directory updated?
Every tool carries the date its facts were last checked against the vendor's own documentation — currently 2026-08-11 across the directory. Pricing and plan changes are the most common corrections; the dataset is public, so a stale row can be reported and fixed directly.
Score your own setup, not just the vendors'
The same 9 standards, turned into a 10-minute readiness assessment.