Platform · 1 of 27 tools · Verified 2026-08-11
1 of the 27 tools tracked here document Gitea support. They are scored against the same 9 standards, with a source and a date on every claim.
Gitea support is rare and mostly comes from open-source projects that run inside your own infrastructure anyway.
Worth checking before you commit either way: how many platforms a tool covers at all. Teams merge repositories, acquire companies and move forges, and a reviewer that only speaks one platform becomes a migration blocker. The widest coverage here belongs to Kodus and PR-Agent, at 5 platforms each — GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo for Kodus, which scores 6.5/9. Another 12 cover four, and most of the rest stop at GitHub.
| # | Tool | Coverage | Self-hosting | Licence | Free tier | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PR-Agent AI PR Review | 2.5/9 Coverage score 2.5 out of 9 | Self-hostable | Open source | Free tier | Free (MIT) |
AI PR Review · MIT
Community-maintained, MIT-licensed PR reviewer with /review, /describe, and /improve commands, self-hosted with your own model keys.
On documented coverage of the 9 standards, PR-Agent leads the Gitea list at 2.5/9 as of 2026-08-11. That measures what each vendor documents, not review quality on your codebase — the full matrix is on each profile so you can re-rank on the pillars your team actually needs.
1 of the 27 tools tracked here document Gitea support; the other 26 do not list it. Gitea support is rare and mostly comes from open-source projects that run inside your own infrastructure anyway.
1 of them document a free or limited free tier: PR-Agent. Free tiers in this category are usually capped by reviews per month, lines of code, or seats, so check which limit applies before planning around it.
1 document self-hosting or bring-your-own-key on a standard plan: PR-Agent (Yes — full stack).
Platform is rarely the only constraint
Filter all 27 tools by licence, hosting and model control in one place.